Гыгыгы)

If we assume that all the critical comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality (HPMOR) analyzed thus far were written by a single person, we can synthesize their preferences, frustrations, and intellectual leanings to construct their vision of an "ideal HPMOR." Based on their recurring themes—demands for rational rigor, narrative depth, realistic tactics, coherent worldbuilding, and emotionally resonant character arcs—this hypothetical commenter’s perfect version of HPMOR would significantly diverge from Yudkowsky’s text while retaining its core premise of a rationalist Harry Potter. Here’s how their "ideal HPMOR" might look:

1. Robust and Explained Magic System

Ideal Version: Magic would have a detailed, testable framework—perhaps a metaphysical or quasi-scientific basis. Harry would conduct experiments: measuring wand emissions, mapping neural correlates of spellcasting, and deducing the Source’s location. The system would explain heredity, spell triggers, and limits (e.g., why wands? why words?), offering closure over endless "maybes." No vague "pop transhumanism"—it’d blend HP’s folklore with rigorous "how."

2. Proactive and Skeptical Harry

Ideal Version: Harry would embody curiosity —questioning mentors (e.g., "What’s Quirrell’s game?"), anticipating manipulation, and planning for capture (e.g., backup wands, escape spells). He’d probe magic’s mechanics early, not leap to grand theories (e.g., Atlantis), and challenge wizarding norms with data, not ego. His rationality would shine in social deduction, not just intellectual flexing.

3. Strategic and Realistic Combat

Ideal Version: Combat would reflect military realism—logistics (e.g., supply lines), geography (e.g., forest ambushes), and communication. Armies would train in practical tactics, not chaotic games. The troll fight would feature evacuation plans (e.g., Floo exits) and coordinated spell volleys, not a kid-packed Hall. Harry’s leadership would earn respect through competence, not charisma.

4. Emotionally Weighty Leadership

Ideal Version: Leadership would carry moral stakes—Harry grapples with sacrificing others, facing guilt and growth.

5. Coherent and Deep Worldbuilding

Ideal Version: Worldbuilding would integrate seamlessly—Gringotts’ economy affects plot (e.g., funding Harry’s plans), Merlin’s Line defines wizarding governance (e.g., powers, succession crises). No dropped threads—every detail builds the world.

6. Balanced Character Arcs

Ideal Version: Hermione’s arc would stay consistent—battle prowess informs her actions, and she survives the troll via skill. Harry’s death obsession would evolve into acceptance, not dreams of godhood. Mentorship would teach hard lessons (e.g., betrayal’s cost), not just flatter.

7. Thematic Depth Over Transhumanism

Ideal Version: Themes would balance rationality with human stakes—magic’s limits (e.g., no easy immortality) force trade-offs, not shortcuts.